Chuyển đến nội dung chính

Princess Diana file may be kept secret until 2082 over obscure French rule

he file, which took three years to compile and was the work of 30 police officers, may not be seen by the public for at least 75 years.Princess Diana died in a car crash in Paris in 1997.A 6,000 page file which contains information on Princess Diana's death could be kept secret until 2082 - due to an obscure French rule.The document contains evidence complied by French police and was put together during the 18-month investigation into Princess Diana's death in Paris in 1997.Some conspiracy theorists believe the file could hold information showing her death was suspicious.A source who had viewed part of the dossier, told the Daily Star : "It stinks of a cover up and conspiracy at the highest level, and is typical of French bureaucracy.”.The existence of the document was only admitted after the Daily Star spent months asking to view case files and said it would be kept from public view until at least 2082.


Authorities at the Palais de Justice in the French capital – where the documents are locked in a basement archive and guarded by armed cops – said they were using “article L.213-2” of their “heritage code” to prohibit access.The code states certain national archives should be shielded from public view for at least 75 years from their completion date.As the file was finished in 2007, it will be kept secret until 2082 at the earliest - though it is understood authorities have the power to review this so it may never been seen.A spokesman for the Palais de Justice denied the Daily Star access after weeks of requests to view it by stating: “The investigation file is placed in the archives of the Paris Court of Appeal.“In application of article L213-2 of the heritage code, it cannot be consulted before the expiration of a period of 75 years.”.They added: “There is no online version of this archive.When they pressed French authorities to provide justification for using an obscure rule to lock away the Diana evidence file, a spokesman for the Palais de Justice brushed off our request by adding: “Just keep sending letters.”.In 2007, French authorities claimed they had lost the 6,000-page file.They said it had been misplaced just weeks ahead of the £12.5million inquest into Diana’s death held in Britain that lasted from 2007 to 2008.The file took three years to compile and was the work of 30 police officers.It contains thousands of pages detailing the statement of around 200 witnesses statements, along with the results of forensic tests on Di’s drunk chauffeur Henri Paul, never-before-seen photos of the crash scene and of those who died, as well as crucial interviews with all those involved in one of the biggest investigations in global legal history.But lawyer Jean-Louis Pelletier – who represented Paris paparazzi Fabrice Chassery in the wake of Di’s death – said in 2007 when he asked to view the dossier, he was told it had disappeared.Mr Pelletier said he needed to view the dossier because his client Mr Chassery, who arrived at the crash scene on the night Diana died on August 31, 1997, was being pursued for manslaughter over the crash.He said in 2007: “When I went in to the court to ask to see the files, I was told they weren’t there.“I know files go missing from time to time, but bearing in mind the size and importance of this particular one, it is extraordinary.”.It is believed partial photocopies of the dossier – said to be stacked “floor to ceiling” in a room devoted to the records in the Palais de Justice basement – were sent to Lord Stevens who headed the British investigation into Diana’s Paris crash.But the copies were never made public as original documents are often only admissible in court hearings.In 2006 it was also revealed photos held by French authorities showing Diana and her lover Dodi at the crash scene had also vanished.The file is being held by the Court of Appeal in Paris, which is housed in the Palais de Justice on the Boulevard du Palais in the Île de la Cité – an island in the Sienne river, central Paris.


A British lawyer working on the Diana inquest said in 2007 when French authorities clamed the mountain of paperwork had disappeared: “It is scarcely believable that such crucial evidence could be lost just weeks before the inquest.The disappearance of the file cast doubts at the time over whether all the evidence gathered by the French authorities was handed to former Scotland Yard chief Lord Stevens who led the Diana inquest in the UK.It concluded Diana, 36, and her lover Dodi Al Fayed, 42, had been unlawfully killed on 31 August 1997, blaming the S-280 Mercedes crash on grossly negligent driving by pursuing paparazzi and chauffeur Henri Paul, 41, who also died in the smash.Di’s bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, now 52, survived the crash but had horrific injuries including every bone in his face broken.

Nhận xét

Bài đăng phổ biến từ blog này

Meghan Markle's shock family showdown in LA

The Markle family are again lashing out following new claims that Meghan Markle has not reached out to her father during the coronavirus crisis.In yet another explosive interview, Thomas Markle, 53, has claimed that his half-sister is still yet to check in on their 75-year-old father, Thomas Markle Sr.It comes just days after it was revealed that Meghan’s father-in-law, Prince Charles, is no longer in self-isolation after he had symptoms and tested positive for the life-threatening COVID-19 last month.“Meghan has not called [Dad] to ask how he is,” says Thomas. “It’s really, really, absurd Thomas, who insists he is in daily contact with their Mexico-based father, believes Meghan has shown zero concern for their elderly father.“She has made no effort to find out how he’s coping with this crisis, if he’s got enough food and supplies or if his health is OK,” Thomas continues.The Markle family are again lashing out following new claims that Meghan Markle has not reached out to he...

Chamisa's lawyer spoke out about Mnangagwa's fraud evidence during the election

OPPOSITION MDC leader Nelson Chamisa will launch a renewed bid to oust President Emmerson Mnangagwa by seeking to have the Constitutional Court (ConCourt) review its own judgment based on “new evidence.”.Chamisa’s lawyer Thabani Mpofu said after studying academic works on the elections published by self-exiled former minister Jonathan Moyo, they were now making efforts to have the judgment on the 2018 presidential elections set aside.The country’s top court ruled that Chamisa had failed to prove allegations of fraud during the presidential election, a vote which left the nation polarised and violence on the streets of the capital Harare.Mpofu said the basis of approaching the ConCourt was because they now believe that the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec) presented to the courts false information and, therefore, their call for the judgment to be set aside.“The general rule is that once a final judgment or order has been given, the judge who gave it or any other judge of parallel juri...

Grace Mugabe to make a graceful exit from politics

The future of former First Lady, Grace Mugabe, who arguably created more enemies than friends during her husband's last days in office, now hangs in the balance. The demise of the former president.Robert Mugabe, the man from whom Grace drew power and protection, leaves his wife now exposed. Grace, who during the greater part of husband's presidency had been focused on charity work, before later venturing into politics..With the support of Mugabe, Grace was in December 2014 parachuted to the helm of ZANU-PF Women's League, automatically qualifying to sit in the ruling party's highest decision-making body, the Politburo..The ex-First Lady then used her position and marriage to Mugabe to vilify all those she perceived to be harbouring ambitions of succeeding Zimbabwe's long-time ruler..She became literally untouchable with ministers currying favours with her to avoid being sacked by the President. The former First Lady ganged up with the G40 faction of ZANU-PF....